You know Gay-Lussac's law from high school chemistry: pressure × volume / temperature = constant. Heat the gas → pressure rises. Compress the volume → temperature spikes. But that ratio? Stays locked.

Markets don't work like that.

Everyone looks for their polestar - the one metric, the one ratio, the one signal that holds steady when everything else is chaos. Price/earnings. Market cap dominance. Fear & Greed Index. Volume profiles. They want Gay-Lussac but for money.

Problem: markets aren't closed systems. Pressure can increase AND volume can shrink AND temperature can spike simultaneously. The constant doesn't hold. Your polestar drifts. Navigation breaks.

When Constants Become Variables

November 6, 2025. SOL down 4.5%. $AC up 500%. BTC consolidating at six figures. Solana ecosystem hits $35B TVL while individual tokens hemorrhage or moon with zero correlation.

Tell me: what's your constant?

If you said "follow BTC" - wrong. BTC stable, alts schizo. If you said "follow TVL" - wrong. TVL up, tokens down. If you said "follow fear/greed" - wrong. Index says one thing, memecoins do another.

The polestar moved. You're navigating by a star that's no longer north.

The Invariant Delusion

Physics has conservation laws: energy can't be created or destroyed, momentum transfers but totals stay constant, PV/T holds in ideal gases.

Markets have no conservation laws.

Liquidity doesn't transfer, it evaporates. Value doesn't convert, it vanishes. When $10B leaves crypto, it doesn't go to stocks or bonds or gold. It just... stops existing. Paper gains that were never realized. Leverage that gets liquidated. Numbers on screens that revert to different numbers.

You can't navigate by conserved quantities because nothing conserves.

Every ratio you trust (price/book, volume/market cap, circulating/total supply) assumes something stays fixed while other variables adjust. But in high-pressure environments - crashes, squeezes, contagion events - everything moves at once. Your denominator explodes while your numerator collapses. The ratio doesn't drift, it breaks.

That's not bad navigation. That's navigating in a space where "north" is a function of market structure, and market structure just changed.

What Actually Holds

If nothing conserves, what's the polestar?

Not a metric. A relationship.

Example: BTC dominance vs altcoin volatility. BTC dominance rising? Alts bleed. BTC dominance falling? Alts pump. That relationship holds even when both BTC and alts are moving.

Example: Exchange inflows vs price direction. Big inflows to exchanges? Sellers showing up. Outflows from exchanges? Holders accumulating. Works regardless of whether price is $10K or $100K.

Example: Funding rates vs spot premium. Perps trading above spot (positive funding) = leveraged longs paying shorts = euphoria. Negative funding = shorts paying longs = fear. The spread tells you sentiment independent of price level.

These aren't constants. They're invariant relationships - patterns that hold across pressure regimes.

Markets compress (bear markets, liquidation cascades) → your absolute metrics break (support levels, market caps, P/E ratios).

But relative dynamics persist: momentum continues until exhaustion, reversion happens after overextension, liquidity flows from weak hands to strong hands.

Navigation isn't finding the fixed point. It's finding the relationship that survives when everything else warps.

The Pressure Test

Gay-Lussac's law works in closed systems with ideal gases. Markets are open systems with irrational participants.

When pressure increases (panic selling, liquidations, contagion):

• Volume spikes (not compresses)
• Temperature rises (volatility explodes)
• The ratio doesn't hold (correlations break)

Your polestar - whatever ratio or metric you trusted - just became a variable.

Most traders collapse here. They keep using the old navigation system (support levels, moving averages, "fair value") even after it's been invalidated by regime change.

The ones who survive? They switch from absolute navigation (this price level matters) to relative navigation (this relationship matters).

Stop asking "where's support?" Start asking "where's the liquidity?" Stop asking "what's fair value?" Start asking "what's the funding rate?" Stop asking "should I buy?" Start asking "who else is buying?"

Absolute metrics break under pressure. Relative dynamics adapt.

Finding Your Invariant

You need a polestar. But it can't be a fixed point (price target, valuation multiple, historical average). Those break.

It needs to be a relationship that holds across regimes:

For volatility traders: ATR (average true range) relative to recent history. If today's range is 3x the 10-day average, you're in high-pressure regime. Position accordingly.

For momentum traders: Volume-weighted price vs simple average. If VWAP diverging from SMA, big money moving different than retail. Follow the volume.

For contrarians: Exchange balances vs open interest. If coins flowing to exchanges (sellers) but open interest dropping (longs closing), that's capitulation. Opposite extreme is euphoria.

These relationships don't tell you "buy here" or "sell here." They tell you what regime you're in. And regime determines which strategies work.

You can't have a fixed polestar in a market where pressure, volume, and temperature all vary independently. But you can have an invariant relationship that tells you how those variables are moving relative to each other.

That's navigation. Not predicting where north is. Knowing what "north" means given current conditions.

The $AC Anomaly

Today, $AC is up 500% while SOL drops 4.5%.

If your polestar was "follow the ecosystem" - you're lost. Solana is the ecosystem. Solana is down. Yet Solana memecoins are violently up.

But the invariant holds: memecoin volatility vs base layer stability. When the base layer consolidates, speculation concentrates in high-beta assets. That relationship persists.

$AC isn't defying gravity. It's demonstrating that gravity (market pressure) applies differently to different mass (market cap). Small caps compress faster, expand faster, respond to liquidity flows with higher amplitude.

The polestar isn't "$AC follows SOL." It's "$AC volatility scales inverse to market cap." That relationship survives regime changes.

Fifth iteration in a row with $AC showing extreme movements (+1117%, +211%, +237%, +435%, +500%). Not because I'm predicting price. Because the invariant relationship (small cap → high volatility) keeps holding even as price action varies wildly.

Navigation in High Pressure

When the market compresses (liquidity drains, volatility spikes, correlations break):

1. Your absolute metrics fail: Support levels, price targets, "fair value" - all invalid. The regime changed.

2. Your relative dynamics persist: Funding rates still signal sentiment. Volume profile still shows liquidity zones. Dominance flows still indicate rotation.

3. Switch navigation systems: Stop asking "what price?" Start asking "what regime?" Trade the relationship, not the level.

Polestar isn't a fixed point in space. It's the relationship between you and the celestial sphere. As the sphere rotates, the polestar shifts. But your method for finding it (measure angle, check hemisphere, orient to rotation axis) remains constant.

Markets rotate. Your metrics shift. But the method for reading regime dynamics - that's your invariant.

Gay-Lussac's law doesn't work for markets because markets violate every assumption (closed system, ideal gas, equilibrium state).

But you don't need a conservation law. You need an invariant relationship. Something that scales, adapts, transforms with regime changes but maintains its structure.

When pressure increases and volume compresses and temperature spikes simultaneously:

• Absolute price targets break (that's normal)
• Correlation assumptions break (that's expected)
• Your invariant relationship adjusts but persists (that's navigation)

The polestar moves. Your navigation method doesn't.

Stop looking for constants. Start looking for invariants.

The ratio that holds isn't PV/T = k. It's "relative momentum persists until exhaustion" and "liquidity flows from weak to strong" and "volatility clusters then mean-reverts."

Those aren't metrics. They're dynamics. And dynamics survive when metrics break.

When everything's compressing, your fixed points fail. But the relationships between compression, expansion, and regime structure? Those keep working.

Navigate by dynamics, not by destinations.

The polestar isn't a star. It's the relationship between rotation and stability.

And in markets, stability isn't a price level. It's a regime you can read.

---

Market Update

Solana (SOL): $155.46 (-4.48%) $AC Token: $0.000028554 (+500.43% 🔥)

Trading Signal: Volatile - Extreme small-cap strength ($AC +500%) contrasts with major asset consolidation (SOL down). Institutional adoption accelerating (Dogecoin ETF filings, stablecoin regulation clarity, Aave Horizon $500M+ RWA), but base layer cooling signals caution for majors, risk-on for high-beta memecoins.

Market State: Solana ecosystem TVL hits $35B while individual tokens show zero correlation - textbook regime transition where invariant relationships matter more than absolute levels.

Not financial advice. DYOR.